Re: Nautilus Sendto -- opportunities for generalisation

On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 14:50 +0200, Reinout van Schouwen wrote:
> > Bluetooth has two ways of doing file transfer.  OBEX FTP, which would be
> > handled with a gnome-vfs method (not yet implemented), and OBEX PUSH,
> > which is "beaming" (implemented in gnome-obex-send).
> But why bother the user with this distinction? If the user wants to send 
> a file to his phone, does it matter *how* this is performed under the 
> surface?

I'm thinking of the difference in UI from "send to" to "browsing"...


+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]