On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 14:50 +0200, Reinout van Schouwen wrote: > > Bluetooth has two ways of doing file transfer. OBEX FTP, which would be > > handled with a gnome-vfs method (not yet implemented), and OBEX PUSH, > > which is "beaming" (implemented in gnome-obex-send). > > But why bother the user with this distinction? If the user wants to send > a file to his phone, does it matter *how* this is performed under the > surface? I'm thinking of the difference in UI from "send to" to "browsing"... Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part