Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.5.0 Development Release
- From: Thomas Vander Stichele <thomas apestaart org>
- To: James Henstridge <james daa com au>
- Cc: Jonathan Blandford <jrb redhat com>, Mark Finlay <sisob tuxfamily org>, Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>, GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, GNOME Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.5.0 Development Release
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 10:15:24 +0200
> >Yeah. I've been removing all the -DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED flags locally
> >for now to get it all building. But we should all try to branch and get
> >building on GTK+-HEAD ASAP, so that we can shake out as many problems
> >from GTK+ as we can.
> I am not saying that the *_DISABLE_DEPRECATED macros should never be
> used; just that they shouldn't be turned on by default for tarball
> builds (kind of like -Werror ...).
I agree. With GStreamer, we usually have Werror on for CVS and off for
releases, and I was planning to add other stuff as well, like
deprecation. I think it would make sense to do this for GNOME as well;
hammer out as many bugs as possible from CVS, but make the releases as
buildable as possible.
Thomas
Dave/Dina : future TV today ! - http://davedina.apestaart.org/
<-*- thomas (dot) apestaart (dot) org -*->
I feel like I'm at something you always say you need more time
Well I'll stay right here and I'll wait for good
until I find a love worth mine
<-*- thomas (at) apestaart (dot) org -*->
URGent, best radio on the net - 24/7 ! - http://urgent.rug.ac.be/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]