Re: Say goodbye to those ugly ass add-to-panel submenu blues
- From: "Bryan W. Clark" <clarkbw clarkson edu>
- To: Erick Woods <erick gnomepro com>
- Cc: iain <iain prettypeople org>, Vincent Untz <vincent vuntz net>, GNOME Desktop Devel <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, usability gnome org
- Subject: Re: Say goodbye to those ugly ass add-to-panel submenu blues
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:45:14 -0500 (EST)
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Erick Woods wrote:
> Maybe categorizing them won't work or isn't necessary, but as GNOME grows,
> the number of applets will increase exponentially. I am aware of several
> applets which are currently in development. I'm sure there are many I don't
> know of and many more to come. Should people really be expected to scroll
> through a list of 10, 100, 500 applets that are available? That is a
> usability nightmare which is far worse than the menus.
Having more than 100 applets would be a usability nightmare by itself.
The categories aren't really helpful to most people and by keeping the
core number of applets to a minimum set we can display all of them without
the categories.
Small descriptions of what each applet does would actually seem to be the
best route.
> > Seth and I decided that the categories were a fairly artificial
> > seperation that didn't add anything. I did have an old version that had
> > categories, but I didn't like it.
>
> Then make it non-artificial and less arbitrary. Come up with a formal
> specification for categorizing these things. I have my tsclient applet
> dropped into "Internet". That's not the greatest spot imo, but it works and
> there were no guidlelines for it's location when I did it.
This is why the categories aren't always the best choice, some applets
don't quite fit into a single category, or there isn't a category for them
at all.
~ Bryan
---
"Chewed Mail."
-- Michael Meeks
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]