Re: default gconf backend cut over

[Luis Villa <louie ximian com>]

On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 19:01, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 11:42, Luis Villa wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 18:26, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 06:41, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 14:19, Rob Adams wrote:
> > > > > I would run HEAD but I can't build the damn thing.
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > gconf, or other stuff?
> > > > 
> > > > It may be time to start flaming maintainers whose stuff doesn't build on
> > > > HEAD.
> > > 
> > > Agreed. I've been filing bugs against most things that fail while
> > > building the last few days, so maybe something will happen. Usually its
> > > the DEPRECATED flags, but there's also some GStreamer churn that is
> > > affecting downstream things which may take a day or two to fix (since
> > > gst-plugins has only been fixed for 24 hours).
> > 
> > Have you given those some flamingly high priority, like IMMEDIATE? :)
> 
> No. I suspect I'm already considered a complete bastard on the build
> front, so I was not trying to push the issue. I was pretty annoyed at
> the number of breakages, so I should get some karma for moral outrage,
> right?
> 
> I shall increase the priorities when I recheck and file a couple of
> others at lunchtime.

Please do. If we can't build, we can't test, and that breaks our whole
process. Plus, if they are of higher priority it is easier for others to
find and hence fix.

Luis