Re: default gconf backend cut over



On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 11:42, Luis Villa wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 18:26, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 06:41, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 14:19, Rob Adams wrote:
> > > > I would run HEAD but I can't build the damn thing.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > gconf, or other stuff?
> > > 
> > > It may be time to start flaming maintainers whose stuff doesn't build on
> > > HEAD.
> > 
> > Agreed. I've been filing bugs against most things that fail while
> > building the last few days, so maybe something will happen. Usually its
> > the DEPRECATED flags, but there's also some GStreamer churn that is
> > affecting downstream things which may take a day or two to fix (since
> > gst-plugins has only been fixed for 24 hours).
> 
> Have you given those some flamingly high priority, like IMMEDIATE? :)

No. I suspect I'm already considered a complete bastard on the build
front, so I was not trying to push the issue. I was pretty annoyed at
the number of breakages, so I should get some karma for moral outrage,
right?

I shall increase the priorities when I recheck and file a couple of
others at lunchtime.

Malcolm




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]