Re: KDE Interop [Was: D-BUS background] - re-using glib
- From: "Gustavo J. A. M. " Carneiro <gjc inescporto pt>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>, Zack Rusin <zackrat speakeasy net>, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller <Uraeus linuxrising org>, Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>, desktop-devel-list gnome org, dbus <message-bus-list freedesktop org>
- Subject: Re: KDE Interop [Was: D-BUS background] - re-using glib
- Date: 05 Mar 2003 18:40:39 +0000
On Qua, 2003-03-05 at 17:35, Owen Taylor wrote:
> But my guess is that the real reasons are harder to address:
>
> - A (perhaps even justified) fear of bloat and slowness through longer
> code paths and wrappers.
>
> - A (perhaps even justified) fear of being forced to program to
> non-C++-friendly and/or non-Qt-friendly API's.
>
> - One more thing to compile, one more thing to learn.
>
> And probably some generalized GFear and GLoathing.
Interesting choice of words.. ;)
Perhaps glib should have different name and prefix. Lets pick a new
letter c, such that (c != 'K' && c != 'G'). How about 'A', for
Agnostic?
alib
aobject, AObject
Nah... just kidding! :)
--
Gustavo Joćo Alves Marques Carneiro
<gjc inescporto pt> <gustavo users sourceforge net>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]