Re: Shipping Vera with 2.4
- From: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- To: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, GST <setup-tool-hackers ximian com>
- Subject: Re: Shipping Vera with 2.4
- Date: 27 Feb 2003 13:55:12 +0000
On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 11:31, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> The problem with using CORBA is that, for simple things like what d-bus
> would be used for, CORBA is overkill, overengineered and heavy.
>
> Take a look at the amount of code one would need to write to get a
> simple IPC between to sessions of one app, with CORBA and dbus.
It's very hard to compare a system that exists, and works with one that
does not.
I'd point you at the code in eg. gnome-terminal/terminal.c that does
the uniqueness stuff - it's a handful of lines, but of course - if you
want to detect errors, do activation etc. you get to write more lines of
code. Either way it's a fraction of the code.
Of course - we should have bonobo-activation tracking all apps, and
make that a standard feature of GnomeProgram. But of course, that would
be obstructed as soon as it's suggested - too similar to D/BUS.
Regards,
Michael.
--
mmeeks gnu org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]