Re: Panel's GConf usage

On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 09:53:44AM +0000, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 13:39, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > I don't see why gconf doesn't work for the panel. The directory
> > structure gives it fine structure, it is not that dynamic (no more so
> > than any other preference), and it can be schema-ed just fine.
> 	Does one still need to make up random/magic numbers to name the
> keys/directories with ? last time I poked (which was a while ago) - that
> was the solution to the lack of structured array/list support, is it
> still so ?

You have a random ID for each panel, yes. I don't really see what's
wrong with that however.

(It *is* wrong for the default panel setup, which could just as soon
use a nice name like "bottom_panel" - but for dynamically created
panels, "panel-1" is as good a name as any)


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]