Re: GNOME Development Series Snapshot 2.3.0: "Mighty Atom"

[Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>]

On Fri, 2003-04-11 at 09:08, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> <quote who="Jeff Waugh">
> 
> > But all of this is what the proposal process is meant to address -> it's
> > up to you guys to convince us to include your software.
> 
> Ahr, this came out wrongly. That's not how it should always work, and
> certainly not for every proposed module. Some things are proposed almost by
> default - fontilus and nautilus-cd-burner are good examples of these.
> They're already regarded as stable, have obvious maintainers, simple goals,
> are appropriately aligned with the goals of the desktop release, fill nice
> feature gaps that users will like, etc.

I feel cheated. Nobody said anything against adding Totem to the desktop
release, and it has all the properties enounced above. Why is it not
getting in the desktop release ?

-- 
/Bastien Nocera
http://hadess.net

#2  0x4205a2cc in printf ("Oh my %s\n", preferred_deity) from
/lib/i686/libc.so.6 printf ("Oh my %s\n", preferred_deity);
Segmentation fault