On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 05:35, Ken Witherow wrote: > future). While it's nice to try to make things as usuable as possible, > everyone's definition of usable is different. gnome was attractive to me > because it was easily configurable in any myriad of ways so it could be > made into the best desktop for anyone who wanted to use it - not simply > how some "usability expert" thought I should use it. To those whom > contributed to gnome 1, I deeply thank you and want you to know your > legacy will live on... to those whom are dictating what's best for me with > gnome 2, I hope you find your greener pasture. amen Ken. -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Ghandi + So let's do it...?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part