Re: having bug-buddy catch SIGABRT
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: jacob berkman <jacob ximian com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: having bug-buddy catch SIGABRT
- Date: 01 Mar 2002 15:04:57 -0500
jacob berkman <jacob ximian com> writes:
> currently bug-buddy only catches SEGVs. however, in gnome 2 i am
> hitting a lot of failed assertions and it would be easier to report
> these if bug-buddy caught them too.
>
> any reasons not to do this?
>
If you really want to piss Luis off and make people fix their stuff,
you could make gnome_program_init() set --g-fatal-warnings during the
betas ;-)
j/k
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]