Re: having bug-buddy catch SIGABRT
- From: Luis Villa <louie ximian com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: jacob berkman <jacob ximian com>, desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: having bug-buddy catch SIGABRT
- Date: 01 Mar 2002 15:08:22 -0500
On Fri, 2002-03-01 at 15:04, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> jacob berkman <jacob ximian com> writes:
> > currently bug-buddy only catches SEGVs. however, in gnome 2 i am
> > hitting a lot of failed assertions and it would be easier to report
> > these if bug-buddy caught them too.
> >
> > any reasons not to do this?
> >
>
> If you really want to piss Luis off and make people fix their stuff,
> you could make gnome_program_init() set --g-fatal-warnings during the
> betas ;-)
Bring it on :)
Luis
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]