Re: having bug-buddy catch SIGABRT
- From: Sander Vesik <sv117949 ireland sun com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: jacob berkman <jacob ximian com>, desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: having bug-buddy catch SIGABRT
- Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 20:57:07 +0000 (GMT)
On 1 Mar 2002, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> jacob berkman <jacob ximian com> writes:
> > currently bug-buddy only catches SEGVs. however, in gnome 2 i am
> > hitting a lot of failed assertions and it would be easier to report
> > these if bug-buddy caught them too.
> >
> > any reasons not to do this?
> >
>
> If you really want to piss Luis off and make people fix their stuff,
> you could make gnome_program_init() set --g-fatal-warnings during the
> betas ;-)
It may be a tiny bit too early, but I don't think there is another way...
>
> j/k
>
> Havoc
>
Sander
I see a dark sail on the horizon
Set under a dark cloud that hides the sun
Bring me my Broadsword and clear understanding
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]