Re: GNOME 2.2 screenshots

On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 04:59, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Stated another way, _adding_ an automake-1.x dependency is no big
> deal, _replacing_ automake with an incompatible one is difficult.

	Sounds like using the explicit versioned name of the required automake
executable is an excellent plan, and future proofs us against the next
amazing autoconf feature.



 mmeeks gnu org  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]