Re: SPEC files for gnome 2.0 beta
- From: Mark McLoughlin <mark skynet ie>
- To: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- Cc: Chris Chabot <chabotc reviewboard com>, <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, <Uraeus linuxrising org>, <gleblanc linuxweasel com>
- Subject: Re: SPEC files for gnome 2.0 beta
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 13:10:59 +0000 (GMT)
Hey Daniel,
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 11:52:01AM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> >
> > Why haven't these not been committed back to CVS?
>
> Well for one i would not appreciate someone comminting updated
> spec RPM changes on my module. I rely on the my CVS spec file features
> a LOT, so anyway the HACKING files intructions applies too.
Sure, I think Chris understands this. I advised he could do as
he pleased with the spec files in gnome-panel/desktop/session and the
ORBit2 modules but not to assume the same for other modules ..
I think any maintainers who want this type of policy should
stick something like this in their HACKING files ..
"
+ Members of the GNOME packaging product may commit
fixes to the .spec files.
"
Good Luck,
Mark.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]