On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 11:36 -0500, Debajyoti Bera wrote: > You are probably facing http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504192 . It > was fixed shortly after 0.3.1 and is available in 0.3.2 Yeah. I had a zero length file indeed. Removed it. > I have thought about this over and over again ... one option is to disable > verbose debug logging by default, but people are against it. The argument > given is, such verbose logging leads us to the errors - without them, we > would not be able to know of certain errors. And this is a valid argument. > The other options like "last message repeated" work against the above > argument. Not really. > Are there reasons to believe that reporting "last message repeated" > is better than disabling debug output ? Yes. Because a) you get at least one full error message and stack and b) you an indication of how frequently it's occurring and c) you don't a bazillion copies of the *exact* same error over and over again eating GBs of disk space until a disk is filled up. b.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part