On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 09:47 -0500, D Bera wrote: > > You do not need to wait for the full run. If its grown to, say, 200 > MB, No, of course not. Each snapshot is interesting in itself. But I have not grown to 200MB yet. Still holding steady at 101.5MB. > you can stop it. A few snapshots (e.g. every tenth one, basically > first, last and a 10 in the middle) would be helpful to know what is > causing the memory rise. In the case of the last (and indeed, this current) run though, it would probably just show a very reasonable and completely understandable situation, no? > You might delete the older ones - since you started the new run with > better (read: worse for your computer) performance. Well, only worse by about 10MB. Still in the noise I'd say. A 100MB beagled is still quite reasonable I'd say. Or is there a goal to get it much lower than that? b. -- My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server. Brian J. Murrell
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part