Re: WebBookmarks Queryable

[Alex Graveley <alex beatniksoftware com>]

Seems like the bookmark backend should look for an existing web history 
hit for the URL and alter that with some bookmark attributes (anything 
other than bookmark name?).  It should create an empty hit with no 
content if the page has not been visited (probably a corner case).

Or am I missing something?

-Alex

Jon Trowbridge wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 13:25 -0400, Joe Shaw wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 02:07 +0200, Jon Trowbridge wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 22:29 +0200, Martijn van Beers wrote:
> > >
> > > > Why does that matter? It isn't really all that interesting whether
> > > > a url was found in your history or in your bookmarks, is it?
> > >
> > > Having the Uris be unique identifiers for the hits is a very convenient
> > > property to be able to assume...
> >
> > Yeah, but I tend to agree with Martijn: you wouldn't want links for
> > google showing up twice despite being the same thing...
>
>
> I agree with that point too.  We definitely want to avoid that.
>
>
> > On the other hand, this will greatly complicate either Hits or Tiles
> > and templates or both. :)
>
>
> Indeed.  Here is the dilemma: if you have multiple hits with the same
> Uri, how do you represent that in the UI?  Do you just display just one
> of the tiles?  If so, which one?
>
> -J
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dashboard-hackers mailing list
> Dashboard-hackers gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dashboard-hackers