Re: kmailqueryable submitted (Was Re: kmailqueryable)

D Bera <dbera.web <at>> writes:

> According to the suggestions, I have changed the queyable and
> submitted the patch to bugzilla.
> If you are kmail user, please use and report problems. Specifically
> perform these tests:
> * creating new mail folder or subfolder
> * moving or receiving mails in these nested subfolders
> There might be issues if inotify isnt enabled, pls report them too.
> - D.
> On 8/4/05, D Bera <dbera.web <at>> wrote:
> > > Yes, but every queryable has to do this anyway.  We used to have a
> > > general crawler class.  It turned out to not be very useful.  You have
> > 
> > Ahh,... I was aiming towards this. Since it was tested and failed, no
> > question of trying it again.
> > There would be a new kmailqueryable in bugzilla by next week.
> >

Hello Berra

i checked out your latest version of KMailQueryable 
it seems you still hav'n included a fall-back mechanism if Inotify not available,
so i was unable to check out your latest version too,

Raghu GS

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]