RE: some performance tunning opportunity of cheese
- From: "Zhao, Halley" <halley zhao intel com>
- To: Stefan Kost <ensonic hora-obscura de>
- Cc: "'cheese-list gnome org'" <cheese-list gnome org>, "Guo, Young" <young guo intel com>
- Subject: RE: some performance tunning opportunity of cheese
- Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 09:21:55 +0800
For still image, I think we do not need timestamp.
For view-finding, the 'sync=false' of video sink could also ignore the timestamp.
Is it right?
-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Kost [mailto:ensonic hora-obscura de]
Sent: 2010年1月8日 17:56
To: Zhao, Halley
Cc: 'cheese-list gnome org'; Guo, Young
Subject: Re: some performance tunning opportunity of cheese
Stefan Kost wrote:
> Zhao, Halley wrote:
>
>> Hi all:
>>
>>
>>
>> 4. cheese on my netbook lack of a/v sync,
>>
>> but when I add ‘do-timestamp’ for both audio and video src, and let
>> audio src ‘provide-clock’. It will be ok for a/v sync.
>>
>> Do you think it is a valid change?
>>
>>
> ‘provide-clock’ for the source imho makes sense when recording audio.
> Are you sure setting "do-timestamp" makes a difference?
>
>
erm, its not as easy as that. The audiosrc is not running for still
images or viewfinder (atleast not in camerabin). Using "provide-clock"
would cause the clock to change while the pipline runs (unless we keep
the audiosrc running all the time).
Stefan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]