On Di, 2009-04-21 at 15:34 +0200, Filippo Argiolas wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Patryk Zawadzki <patrys pld-linux org> wrote: > >>> It would be perfectly fine to just generate ChangeLog from git history > >>> when packaging a release. No need to keep it under version control. > >> is there any specific format you would need? > > > > Usual stuff: date, name, description, files affected? > > As far I as I know Behdad is working on integrating the ChangeLog > macro directly into gnome-common as soon as the git module is fixed. > As he wrote the current rule that can be found on l.g.o and that > several modules are already using the format will probably stay that > one (git log --stat). so, should we wait for the work being finished? another thing: on the ddl-list, some guys proposed some other format. might be worth a look daniel -- this mail was sent using 100% recycled electrons ================================================ daniel g. siegel <dgsiegel gmail com> http://home.cs.tum.edu/~siegel gnupg key id: 0x6EEC9E62 fingerprint: DE5B 1F64 9034 1FB6 E120 DE10 268D AFD5 6EEC 9E62 encrypted email preferred
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part