On Mo, 2009-04-20 at 10:19 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:02 AM, daniel g. siegel <dgsiegel gnome org> wrote: > > On So, 2009-04-19 at 15:13 +0200, Filippo Argiolas wrote: > >> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 2:23 PM, daniel g. siegel <dgsiegel gnome org> wrote: > >> > hi there! > >> hey, > >> > >> > as we moved to git, im wondering if somebody still needs the changelog > >> > file? if nobody is against that, i would remove it. > >> > >> I was about to send a similar mail :) > >> Go ahead, if someone still wants a ChangeLog in the tarball we can use > >> the dist-hook rule from http://live.gnome.org/Git/ChangeLog > > well, should we include that rule? is there anybody, who needs it? > > Downstream packagers still need quick access to the ChangeLog > (checking out all GNOME repos AND downloading the release tarballs > does not seem like the best thing to do) :) so it would be enough for you guys, if we just update the changelog file when doing a release? > -- this mail was sent using 100% recycled electrons ================================================ daniel g. siegel <dgsiegel gmail com> http://home.cs.tum.edu/~siegel gnupg key id: 0x6EEC9E62 fingerprint: DE5B 1F64 9034 1FB6 E120 DE10 268D AFD5 6EEC 9E62 encrypted email preferred
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part