On Di, 2008-04-01 at 22:02 -0700, James Liggett wrote: > On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 03:30 +0200, daniel g. siegel wrote: > > > this is very complex.. did you plan to add the widgets in the code? i > > would prefer glade/gtkbuilder for the preference window. the synchronize > > option is very nice though, to easy update the gconf settings. > I was afraid you'd say that! :-) The classes aren't widgets themselves; > they just wrap the widgets. We will get the widgets with builder. To be > totally clear, I really don't want to go through all the trouble of > making custom widgets and the glade catalog to go with them. So to > repeat: the classes are *not* widgets, at the most they just hold a > pointer to them... ;) ah thats totally ok! ;) > > > hmm.. i think handling resolutions is just too complex for the average > > user... what about having 3 entries, like "small", "medium", "large"? we > > could extend that even to 5 or so > I personally prefer to see resolutions, as my camera has like eight > different ones. If that's the case, how do I know exactly what > constitutes "small," "medium," or "large," or any of the others? i just think about "standardized" entries in gconf. storing the resolution doesnt work, as a user could plug in another webcam, set a wrong resolution, ... and even if you have about 10 resolutions available.. i dont know if you want to access all of them? > > > > > youre awesome ;) need help implementing this? > Thanks!! :-) I might need some help with moving over the effects key to > the new implementation of CheeseGConf. I notice that the set/get > property functions there convert GSList to string and vice-versa. Since > I'm trying to standardize the way keys get set by type, I'm wondering if > we should treat all list keys like we treat the effects. What would you > do here? Convert the effect stuff to work with GSList, or just convert > all lists to strings when we give them to the client code? we thought that putting around a gslist could be too tricky, so we are converting the gslist to a string and passing that around. > > If I need help with anything else, you'll be the first to know. :) > > Thanks again, > James > -- this mail was sent using 100% recycled electrons ================================================ daniel g. siegel <dgsiegel gmail com> http://home.cs.tum.edu/~siegel gnupg key id: 0x6EEC9E62 fingerprint: DE5B 1F64 9034 1FB6 E120 DE10 268D AFD5 6EEC 9E62 encrypted email preferred
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part