Send Builder-list mailing list submissions to
builder-list gnome orgTo subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/builder-listor, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
builder-list-request gnome orgYou can reach the person managing the list at
builder-list-owner gnome orgWhen replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Builder-list digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: gnome-builder 3.20.0 (Daniel Espinosa)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:31:55 -0600
From: Daniel Espinosa <
esodan gmail com>
To: Christian Hergert <
christian hergert me>
Cc:
builder-list gnome orgSubject: Re: [Builder] gnome-builder 3.20.0
Message-ID:
<CAHirWtKtucHYGk0U-4MmBrxy=
ABUMErLvj6gnp45a-ObaLxK4Q mail gmail com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
El mar. 23, 2016 12:15 AM, "Christian Hergert" <
christian hergert me>
escribi?:
>
> On 03/22/2016 08:11 PM, Daniel Espinosa wrote:
> > May you can add xdg-app information to use this application
> > immediately after it is available. At the same time may is a good
> > idea to release it in xdg-app same day as for tarballs.
>
> We currently have two reasons I'm not heavily pushing the Xdg-App
> version of Builder as "the version to get".
>
> 1) Terminals are spawned inside the run-time, meaning that you see an OS
> that may not be what you expect (e.g. your host system). I'd like both
> to be possible.
>
This means Builder shows you the runtime environment provided by xdg-app no
my host?
If this is true then I think this is OK for now, because you can develop
and test over more modern runtimes while they become the standard, I mean,
available in LTS versions. Developer can choose to release a tarball, to
build and test over other platforms.
Point here is to provide a more productive development environment, as soon
as possible. That is something I'm expecting for a while.
> 2) Creating an Xdg-App is an important part of our story going forward,
> and Xdg-Apps are not currently recursive. Meaning we would need helpers
> external to the run-time to help setup and build projects within a
> potentially alternate run-time.
>
This is a good vision, nut nothing should stop you to develop and test,
over productive environment; then go out from it, to use more traditional
configure/make/make install/make check on other platforms or runtimes.
> -- Christian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/builder-list/attachments/20160323/80198179/attachment.html>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Builder-list mailing list
Builder-list gnome orghttps://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/builder-list------------------------------
End of Builder-list Digest, Vol 15, Issue 10
********************************************