El mar. 23, 2016 12:15 AM, "Christian Hergert" <<a href="mailto:christian@hergert.me">christian@hergert.me</a>> escribió: > > On 03/22/2016 08:11 PM, Daniel Espinosa wrote: > > May you can add xdg-app information to use this application > > immediately after it is available. At the same time may is a good > > idea to release it in xdg-app same day as for tarballs. > > We currently have two reasons I'm not heavily pushing the Xdg-App > version of Builder as "the version to get". > > 1) Terminals are spawned inside the run-time, meaning that you see an OS > that may not be what you expect (e.g. your host system). I'd like both > to be possible. > This means Builder shows you the runtime environment provided by xdg-app no my host? If this is true then I think this is OK for now, because you can develop and test over more modern runtimes while they become the standard, I mean, available in LTS versions. Developer can choose to release a tarball, to build and test over other platforms. Point here is to provide a more productive development environment, as soon as possible. That is something I'm expecting for a while. > 2) Creating an Xdg-App is an important part of our story going forward, > and Xdg-Apps are not currently recursive. Meaning we would need helpers > external to the run-time to help setup and build projects within a > potentially alternate run-time. > This is a good vision, nut nothing should stop you to develop and test, over productive environment; then go out from it, to use more traditional configure/make/make install/make check on other platforms or runtimes. > -- Christian