Re: [Banshee-List] Developers: Gearing up for 1.5.0

["Andrés G. Aragoneses" <knocte gmail com>]

So, given that 1.5.0 was not compatible DB-wise with 1.4.3, I
implemented this as a breaking change as well (to prevent the database
bloat). Feedback welcome:

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563630


	Andrés


Andrés G. Aragoneses wrote:
> Aaron Bockover wrote:
>> I don't see a reason a patch for that bug would have to be a breaking
>> change. The existing absolute URI column would remain the same, and then
>> two new columns (directory and file name) would be introduced to
>> supplement the absolute URI column.
> 
> Right, when I wrote that e-mail I was thinking about a fix that splits
> the URI in 2 fields, instead of adding 2 new.
> 
> 
>> I am a little hesitant though just because it means more columns to keep
>> in sync, and more database bloat, but maybe it's worth it for the
>> feature.
> 
> That's why I was thinking about splitting instead of adding, as it would
> minimize the bloat. But then there's no compatibility. In conclusion, I
> share the same doubt as Gabriel has asked.
> 
> 	Andrés
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Anyone?
>>
>> --Aaron
>>
>> On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 10:49 -0400, "Andrés G. Aragoneses" wrote:
>>> Would that mean that we cannot land a patch for this bug?:
>>>
>>> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563630
>>>
>>> Keep up the good work!
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> 	Andrés
>> _______________________________________________
>> banshee-list mailing list
>> banshee-list gnome org
>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/banshee-list
> 
> _______________________________________________
> banshee-list mailing list
> banshee-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/banshee-list