Re: [Banshee-List] Fwd: Lastfm 2.0 access



On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 1:33 PM, LCID Fire <lcid-fire gmx net> wrote:
> Andrew Conkling wrote:
>> If you rule that criterion out, would you be in better shape?
> I would - since I could use a minor proxy and change it so it runs
> within one process.

Why do you need an in-process proxy? Can't you just provide the cache
on your own (using sqlite for example) instead of blindly hammering
the API and using another library for sanitization?

-- 
Patryk Zawadzki
PLD Linux Distribution


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]