Re: [Banshee-List] Fwd: Lastfm 2.0 access
- From: LCID Fire <lcid-fire gmx net>
- To: banshee-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Banshee-List] Fwd: Lastfm 2.0 access
- Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:33:48 +0200
Andrew Conkling wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 13:12, LCID Fire <lcid-fire gmx net
> <mailto:lcid-fire gmx net>> wrote:
>
> I have a few requirements:
> - It has to be LGPL or a more liberal license (since I don't want to be
> forced to license my lastfm library under the GPL)
>
>
> Looking around I did not find a single library which would do these
> things. So finally I decided to implement one on my own. Looking at the
> proxies they are all licensed under GPL so I can't even start using one
> of those - so I'm starting from scratch.
>
>
> If you rule that criterion out, would you be in better shape?
I would - since I could use a minor proxy and change it so it runs
within one process.
> I'm curious, without going off on too much of a tangent, but why so
> concerned about not using the GPL?
Because when I release an inprocess proxy library or a lastfm library I
don't want to force anyone else to use the GPL - with the LGPL you can
link to the library as long as you don't extend the library - which is
e.g. needed for Banshee with its MIT License.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]