Re: [Banshee-List] {OT} DAAP vs. NFS
- From: Grant <emailgrant gmail com>
- To: banshee-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Banshee-List] {OT} DAAP vs. NFS
- Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:03:07 -0700
> > Use Tangerine [1]. Yes, FLAC should work. Decoding depends on the
> > client, not the server. In the near future, I'll be stripping the DAAP
> > server support from Banshee altogether and we will be using Tangerine
> > for this, which persists as a small daemon outside the Banshee process.
> >
> > Needless to say, Tangerine is the most supported and recommended DAAP
> > server for Banshee, and best suited for desktop usage. It's also
> > completely cross platform with native UIs for it (Linux/GTK, OS X/Cocoa,
> > Windows).
> >
> > [1] http://www.snorp.net/log/tangerine
> >
> > --Aaron
>
> That looks pretty slick. Do you think there is any advantage to using
> DAAP/Tangerine instead of NFS with Banshee? I've never used either,
> but it seems like Tangerine is probably easier to set up, but NFS is
> more flexible. Is that what it comes down to?
That does look slick indeed. What about those of us serving our music
from X-less boxes though? That's why mt-daapd held so much promise
for me, until I found NFS. Of course, that has its problems too....
Andrew, could you tell me about the NFS problems?
- Grant
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]