[Banshee-List] Re: Banshee 0.8.7.1
- From: Aaron Bockover <abockover novell com>
- To: Gary Ekker <gekker novell com>
- Cc: Banshee List <banshee-list gnome org>, Kelli Frame <kframe novell com>, JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
- Subject: [Banshee-List] Re: Banshee 0.8.7.1
- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 13:11:43 -0400
> This is in for BETA3. Attached are the current patches. One is just your
> basic, don't return random data fix.
I didn't see any attachments to this message... I take it the random
data fix was in libipoddevice? I added only one function to
libipoddevice, and it returns a boolean... I guess I need to see the
patch.
> The banshee.exe.config.in needed a major overhall so that banshee would
> run, and find all the libraries it needs. The patch also makes it work
> on x86_64, which isn't i guess too important, since it looks like we
> will ship just the 32-bit version.
I'd like to see this too... I thought I had fixed all the mappings to
the .so.<VERSION> format.
> I had to add mappings for libdbus-1 and libhal.
Hrm... needed for dbus-sharp/hal-sharp? I wouldn't think they'd be
needed for libipoddevice.
> The libipoddevice mapping points to libipoddevice.so.0.0.0 it should point to
> libipoddevice.so.0, but we need to fix the build in libipoddevice to
> actually create that symlink first.
Looking in /usr/lib, where I have libipoddevice installed...
/usr/lib/libipoddevice.a
/usr/lib/libipoddevice.la
/usr/lib/libipoddevice.so
/usr/lib/libipoddevice.so.0
/usr/lib/libipoddevice.so.0.0.0
>From source, of course... but I'd think the .so.0 and the .so.0.0.0
would be in the package?
> The packaging is split as you requested:
>
> banshee
> banshee-devel
> banshee-engine-gst
> baanshee-engine-helix
>
> Submount and helix are enabled.
Very cool... thanks a lot Gary!
--Aaron
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]