Reá: Reá: new version of gpgme (0.4.5) breaks signature checking

Le 19.03.2004 19:51, Albrecht Dre▀ a Úcritá:
> Am 18.03.04 22:24 schrieb(en) Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh):
>> I've done this test and got 2 log file : one for libgpgme 0.4.3 and  
>> the other with 0.4.5. The balsa executable is the same and from the  
>> cvs 2-0 with your "anti-colorisation" [tm] patch (BTW, the orange  
>> colour when a signature is invalid is really ugly ;-) ).
> That should be the same colour as used for the "invalid address"  
> label (which you can change in the prefs). Seems to be a semi-optimal  
> solution, though...

Ok, fine... bold is enough for me ;-)

> - I guess you built balsa with threading (pthread) support? Is the  
> binary correctly linked against libgpgme-pthread (try "ldd balsa")?  
> It might be worth a try to build balsa *without* threading and see if  
> you get the same effect with 0.4.5;

Yes, I built it with:
./ --prefix=/opt/balsa --with-ldap --with-gpgme --with-ssl
so I got a threaded version.

It is correctly linked I think :
[...] => /usr/lib/ (0x40f25000

I'm building a non-threaded version... today, balsa is keeping my  
processor hot  ;-)

> - Did you build gpgme-0.4.5 yourself, or is it from a bin package?  
> The only important change apart from a few bug fixes between  
> 0.4.3/0.4.4 and 0.4.5 was the introduction of large file support (64  
> bit length), which shouldn't make any difference. So if it's a bin  
> package, it might be interesting to see what happens if you build  
> gpgme (or gpgme and libgpg-error) from sources; it's pretty easy,  
> just "./configure; make all install".

I got gpgme from debian sid. I've installed the binaries. I will build  
it from the sources also...

The same problem occurs with the balsa cvs I've compiled myself and  
with the binaries I got from debian.

Stay tuned ;-)

		- Jean-Luc

PGP signature

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]