Press : lwn.net ran a graphic MUAs review

[manu <eallaud yahoo fr>]

	Hi all,
I read in lwn.net a review about graphical MUAs. Balsa was in, and the  
"grumpy editor" said that he was not able to use 2.1.x, and then used  
2.0.17 for his review. Obviously he then judged balsa as being behind,  
and moreover I think its version was built without threads (which is  
the only safe option for 2.0.x as it hangs too often IMHO).
So do you think we should ask him to try 2.1.91 and help him out for  
the build process if necessary?
Bye
Manu

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature