Re: Press : lwn.net ran a graphic MUAs review

[Pawel Salek <pawsa theochem kth se>]

On 07/10/2004 05:45:06 AM, manu wrote:
>  I read in lwn.net a review about graphical MUAs. Balsa was in, and   
> the   "grumpy editor" said that he was not able to use 2.1.x, and  
> then used   2.0.17 for his review. Obviously he then judged balsa as  
> being  behind,   and moreover I think its version was built without  
> threads (which is  the only safe option for 2.0.x as it hangs too  
> often IMHO).  So do you think we should ask him to try 2.1.91 and  
> help him out for  the build process if necessary?

I think it would be a great idea!

Pawel