Re: imap troubles

On 02/20/04 02:47:11, Pawel Salek wrote:
> On 02/20/2004 01:56:13 AM, Kacper Wysocki wrote:
>> [snip]
>> Ha I must have forgotten myself. Here's 't is:
[snip wrong capability string]
> Are we talking about the same server? I get:
[snip correct capability string]

Ha again, too little sleep and too much work makes Jack a very dull boy  

> CRAM-MD5 is clearly on the list. OTOH, this server is strange because   
> it advertises STARTTLS for a connection that is already encrypted   
> with SSL. Somebody has been messing around there - ordinary cyrus   
> servers do not do that.

I'll get in touch with the admins over the spring break now that I have  
a clear picture of what to ask for. I'll see if I can sort something  

Since you say the RFC states to try strongest auth first, kmail clearly  
must have included their IMAP login type options as a workaround for  
broken clients.

As for now, good night.


PGP signature

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]