Re: Balsa's In-Reply-To header non-compliant?
- From: Brian Stafford <brian stafford uklinux net>
- To: balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Balsa's In-Reply-To header non-compliant?
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:12:17 +0100
On 2003.09.23 03:43, Peter Bloomfield wrote:
> Help me out here: RFC 2822 says that the In-Reply-To header is:
> in-reply-to = "In-Reply-To:" 1*msg-id CRLF
> msg-id = [CFWS] "<" id-left "@" id-right ">" [CFWS]
> and CFWS is, of course, a _comment or _folding _white _space
> (comments are parenthesized).
> So how does Balsa's
> In-Reply-To: <20030921022718.GA12801@Mercury.localdomain>; from
> PeterBloomfield@bellsouth.net on Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 04:27:18 +0200
> comply? I don't see where "; lots of stuff" is [CFWS]! What am I
I wondered if RFC 822 had more liberal syntax and indeed it does.
Nevertheless, "; lots of stuff" doesn't even comply with RFC 822.
Maybe its a case of following an example rather than the standard when
] [Thread Prev