Re: Balsa's In-Reply-To header non-compliant?
- From: Peter Bloomfield <PeterBloomfield bellsouth net>
- To: balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Balsa's In-Reply-To header non-compliant?
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 06:14:52 -0400
On 09/23/2003, Brian Stafford wrote:
[ snip ]
> Hi Peter,
>
> I wondered if RFC 822 had more liberal syntax and indeed it
> does. Nevertheless, "; lots of stuff" doesn't even comply with
> RFC 822. Maybe its a case of following an example rather than
> the standard when coding.
>
> Brian
Thanks, Brian--I thought it might be! I believe that putting all
the stuff in parentheses instead of after a semi-colon would make
it comply (not that anyone's parser is complaining afaict, but
why not comply when it's that easy?).
Peter
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]