Re: Balsa's In-Reply-To header non-compliant?
- From: Darko Obradovic <dobradovic gmx de>
- To: balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Balsa's In-Reply-To header non-compliant?
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 08:40:10 +0200
Am 23.09.2003 04:43 schrieb(en) Peter Bloomfield:
> I don't see where "; lots of stuff" is [CFWS]! What am I missing?
It sound like you verified somewhere that it complies. Seeing the rule,
I wouldn't say so either, needs a newline instead of the semicolon.
Darko Obradovic
PGP signature
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
