Re: What is IMAP status for now?

On 2002.10.14 07:56 M. Thielker wrote:
[ snip ]
> Was that, by any chance, accompanied by the message "Junk after 
> literal"? If so, I have a workaround, possibly a way to fix 
> that one for good, too.
> Melanie

Hi Melanie!

I was hit by that one a week or two ago, too.  It looks to me as 
though libmutt miscounts the bytes in a message when the last 
line isn't newline-terminated, because of a misplaced feof(fp) 
check--is that what your workaround fixes?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]