Re: Simplification of preferences
- From: "M. Thielker" <balsa t-data com>
- To: balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Simplification of preferences
- Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:45:53 +0100
Hello,
I very strongly disagree. I would have to stop upgrading and participating
here and keep the current version if you made those changes. Details are
below:
On 2002.11.13 22:48 Toralf wrote:
> Mail Options
> Incoming
> Check IMAP/Check INBOX only
> Never liked these. I'd prefer being able to choose between e.g.
> 1. Check all folders
> 2. Check open folders
> 3. Check current (viewed) folder
> But perhaps we could remove the setting and agree on one mode, like
> 2. above.
Definitely needed. There must be a way to disable checking of IMAP servers
for people like me who use IMAP for shared storage, but never receive mail
there. I don't really like having new messages shown when I only move
messages to IMAP, but that is exactly what would happen. I then would have
to open each folder in turn to make the new message indication go away
again. With folders of 8000+ messages, it would be extremely
time-consuming. Without the ability to inhibit IMAP checks, it would be
unworkable.
> Display message if mail has arrived in an open mailbox
> Do we really need this?
I need it, at least. My mailer is always open. When I'm away and I return
to my PC, I need to see that there's new mail immediately. A sound is no
use, sonce I'm away at the time the message arrives, I won't hear it.
Always opening the mailer window (which is normally shaded) is too
cumbersome and I would forget it. So unread important business mail would
sit there unnoticed until the next batch of emails comes in, while I'm
there to hear the sound. I need that persistent new mail indicator. If that
goes away, I would have to look for another mail program.
> Do background check quietly (no messages in status bar)
> And this?
Definitely needed, without that option checked, Balsa will freeze on the
background check when it's been open for a few days. Again, if that feature
is removed, I'd have to switch.
> Quoted text regular expression
> Find a reasonable default and remove setting.
>
> Outgoing
> Send message as 'text/plain;format=flowed'
> Maybe this could always be on, but with some way of disabling
> it for individual messages via Compose window.
> Edit headers in external editor
> Does anyone ever do that?
> Don't include HTML parts as text when replying or forwarding mail
> Not necessary with proper multipart/alternative handling
> (introduced a after this setting) and *basic* HTML support
> (I've submitted patches for that.)
I, personally, don't want even rudimentary html support for outgoing email.
I don't want to send HTML mail. I don't really want to see HTML mail. I
would like to abolish HTML mail altogether, but it seems to be here to
stay. I am strongly considering working up a private patch to suppress HTML
if text/plain is present in multipart/alternative. It's been discussed here
before, but it seems our RFC gurus set standards conformance before
usability and, even though such a pref would not change the way Balsa
behaves on the net, but only what the user sees, they don't want it. I
would like to have it, though, especially since the mouse wheel doesn't
work in HTML view and I have to use the scrollbar to scroll down to the
icons and select text/plain. It's a pain.
> Forward a mail as attachment instead of quoting it
> Always do that; remove setting (but perhaps keep
> special menu selection for "forward inline".)
I, personally, always forward inline. I often need to delete things like
confidential mail addresses, pricing, etc, from mail that I forward. Having
that as the default is handy for me because it means I can use a keyboard
shortcut rather than a menu. However, if that one went away, I could live
with it if the menu selection remains.
> Copy outgoing message to sentbox
> Belongs in Identities in the sense that it complements Bcc: setting.
>
>
> Display
> Display
> Main Window
> Maybe a slightly less configurable layout would be OK.
> Display Progress Dialog
> Hard-code a suitable setting and remove from preferences.
There is no suitable setting, IMHO. I, for example, want that turned off
always. It steals the focus from my foreground application, I can't have
that. So the only option for me would be to permanently remove it. I don't
think others see it quite like that, so a pref is needed.
>
> Status messages
> Shouldn't be configurable, at least not via a dialog accessible
> to normal users.
>
> Threading
> Remove. Hardcode default e.g. to JZW, but store View menu settings
> on an individual mailbox basis, instead.
>
>
> Misc
> Debug
> Not for regular users and thus has no place in Preferences.
> Use command line, environment or hidden dialog instead.
> Automatically close mailbox...
> Do we really need that? How lazy are we?
> Drag and drop moves messages by default
> Remove. Us modifiers (the usual desktop way) to distinguish between
> move and copy.
That was put in on request from several users. I need it, too. Gnome
default behaviour would be to copy. That is not proper. When I sort mail, I
use drag and drop. I don't want to do any CTRL-Key acrobatics for every
message I move. Way too much work. Also, other mailers also move by
default. The only acceptable option, for me, would be to hardcode that pref
as "on". On the rare occasions I _do_ want to make a copy, I use modifiers.
>
>
> Startup
> Open Inbox upon startup
> Maybe we should always do that? Or use (existing) command line
> option only to control behaviour.
Unless we have an Evo-like startup page, that could go away. It makes no
sense to _not_ open the inbox on startup. For those rare exceptions, a
command line option would be fine, I guess.
> Check mail upon startup
> Remove preference; decide on sensible behaviour common to all.
That's no good for dialup users who may not be connected and may not want
to dial when opening the program. There seems to be no reliable method to
detect a dialup settting, so it needs to remain a pref.
> Remember open mailbox between sessions
> Possibly useful, but is it worth the effort?
Has proven useless to me, the wild jumping around while mailboxes are
opened is annoying and the last mailbox to open is not always the inbox, as
would be proper.
> IMAP Folder Scanning
> Move settings to Mail Options/Incoming.
>
I believe that removing any but the debugging prefs would make Balsa
poorer. With a logical layout. all the existing prefs could be well placed
and new ones added in a consistent fashion. I like software that is highly
customizable, a program like a mail cilent, that is a major part of my
daily productive work, needs to be able to adapt to the way I work as much
as possible. If a software cramps my style, I have to look for another that
doesn't. Software shouldn't force people to do things in certain ways, it
should adapt to all the various way peoples minds are organized. There can
never be enough prefs. Some can be moved to "Advanced..." sub-dialogs, but
removing prefs is, IMHO, always a bad choice.
Also, I think that on none of these options you are considering to remove,
all people on this list could agree to a hardcoded setting. There are so
many differences in the way even the few people on this list work that I
don't think that a sensible setting for each can be found, that all can
agree to. Just reorganize, but don't remove, is my opinion on this.
Regards,
Melanie
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]