Re: Balsa v1.2.pre3 on Solaris8 - I have it compiled and working...
- From: Brian Stafford <brian stafford uklinux net>
- To: pawsa theochem kth se
- Cc: Brian Stafford <brian stafford uklinux net>,James McPherson Sun COM, balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Balsa v1.2.pre3 on Solaris8 - I have it compiled and working...
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 08:38:30 +0100
On Mon, 24 September 22:22 pawsa@theochem.kth.se wrote:
>
> On 2001.09.24 18:11 Brian Stafford wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 September 17:03 Pawel Salek wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2001.09.18 08:56 James McPherson - TSG Engineer wrote:
> > > > ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --disable-flock \
> > >
> > > Does anybody knows a way to detect that the flock functions should not
> > be
> > > used (like on Sun).
> > When a platform is known to have a broken implementation of a function
> >or
> > system call, there should be a specific macro to test for it in autoconf
> > since this means more than just AC_CHECK_FUNC(...) is needed.
>
> Actually, the problem with Solaris is that - as I understand - flock
> function is in some compatibility library. Also, the constant definitions
> are NOT in <sys/file.h>, as on linux and BSD systems (IFAIK). This makes
> the compilation fail - see http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61058
>
> I guess tackling this issue should be easier than a general bug.
In that case AC_CHECK_FUNC(flock) should be sufficient unless the compatibiltiy
library is needed elsewhere.
Brian
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]