Re: Balsa + libESMTP patch

[Carlos Morgado <chbm chbm nu>]

On 2001.05.02 20:07:17 +0100 Brian Stafford wrote:
> 
> On 2001.05.02 19:12:47 +0100 Carlos Morgado wrote:
> 
> <long and boring discussion snipped>
> 
> Carlos, you obviously differ in viewpoint to me here.  Neither of us
> is prepared to back down.  Your attitude has been downright hostile
ok, i didn't mean to be hostile. hostility would be ignoring your patch.
idiocy would be commiting right away something that for all i know might
just break balsa to the point of uselessness. 

> and criticism is easy when you aren't the one who has spent every
> moment of limited spare time coding libESMTP for the last few months.
> I have a vested interest in the success of libESMTP.  If you don't
> want to use libESMTP that is your problem, not mine.
> 

lets get this straight, i wanted a --with-libesmtp option to be able to 
commit the patch right away on main cvs and get it tested. then i purposed
a branch in cvs to get thing into cvs. this is *not* not wanting to use it.
i just want stuff done in the least disruptive way possible and without
throwing away stuff that works *now* and works for some people.

> If Balsa doesn't adopt my code, I'll survive.

i don't say what goes or doesn't go into the main branch :)


anwyway, pawel agrees on branching, commiting and see what happens.
that should be fine with you right ?

cheers.

-- 
Carlos Morgado - chbm(at)chbm(dot)nu - http://chbm.nu/ -- gpgkey: 0x1FC57F0A
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/ FP:0A27 35D3 C448 3641 0573 6876 2A37 4BB2 1FC5 7F0A
Software is like sex; it's better when it's free. - Linus Torvalds