Re: [jwz jwz org: Re: CVS problems (2/23/01)]



On 2001.03.20 14:48:55 +0000 Matthew Guenther wrote:
> 
> On Mar 20 2001 01:31 Pawel Salek wrote:
> > Big Jamie says that there is something wrong assuming that our JWZ
> > threading is slower than _SIMPLE - which is my impression. Any opinions?
> > 
> 
> I don't find it slower, they both seem comparable on my computer
> (of course I don't have any _really_ big mailboxes). Anyone
> tried profiling it?
> 
> MBG

it's *much* slower on an athlon doing a 10M mbox. cpu bound too. 

-- 
Carlos Morgado - chbm(at)chbm(dot)nu - http://chbm.nu/ -- gpgkey: 0x1FC57F0A
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/ FP:0A27 35D3 C448 3641 0573 6876 2A37 4BB2 1FC5 7F0A
Software is like sex; it's better when it's free. - Linus Torvalds





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]