Re: Unable to load the "aspell" module.
- From: Daniel Hedrick <dhedrick works com>
- To: balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Unable to load the "aspell" module.
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 16:58:42 -0500
On 2001.08.13 15:38 Pawel Salek wrote:
> You can refer to the thread beginning at:
>
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/balsa-list/2001-July/msg00040.html
Okay,
Based on the current thread, and the archived thread Pawel points out
above (and based on RedHat bug 42471), I'm pretty sure that my
pspell install is all boof'ed up, since I get the following:
ursula:~# /sbin/ldconfig -p | grep spell
libpspell.so.4 (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/libpspell.so.4
libpspell.so (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/libpspell.so
libpspell-modules.so.1 (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/libpspell-modules.so.1
libpspell-modules.so (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/libpspell-modules.so
libpspell-impl.so.6 (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/libpspell-impl.so.6
libpspell-impl.so (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/libpspell-impl.so
libaspell.so.4 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libaspell.so.4
libaspell.so (libc6) => /usr/lib/libaspell.so
So, my question is (and perhaps it's more appropriate to find some
aspell / pspell mailing list for this question), based on above,
don't I need
libpspell_aspell.so.1 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libpspell_aspell.so.1
libpspell_aspell.so (libc6) => /usr/lib/libpspell_aspell.so
around? Is there any chance that the latest pspell goo will make
this work (that is, if I have the .la file that Christophe points
out is necessary)?
Thx,
-daniel
PS For those who are less concerned with American colloquialisms:
boof'ed == broken
goo == things I don't want to deal with but probably have to.
--
Daniel Hedrick
dhedrick@works.com
"Some mistakes are too much fun to make only once."
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]