Re: OutBox purpose

[hector huron scouts-es org]

>   Well, you don't. The fcc problem was mentioned on this list, I
>   believe and is not fixed in the CVS version. Am I wrong?
>
You are right. I did never made the commit with the fix. I'm sorry.
   
> 
>   I absolutely agree with you on this point: you can do it much better
>   than I can. I have just picked up this part since I have myself
>   problems with fcc (which basically doesn't work at all) and have heard
>   other people complaining on it, too.
> 
>   Let's settle then you will fix the fcc problem: is it OK? But please,
>   *please* clean up the code: the present CVS version is a mess and has
>   a number of memory leaks.
>
Unless anybody has another idea for implementing sending funtions (which we can discuss), I'll try to have it working  by the end of next week and them I'll start to clean the code.
 
> Pawel
>

Hector