Re: libfetchmail (was Re: Camel)

David Fallon wrote:

> > For IMAP, though, I really think that we would be better off writing our
> > own backend.  Of course, we could borrow heavily from Fetchmail or
> > libmutt, or whatever is convenient, but I don't see it as a simple
> > "plug-it-in" solution.
> Why? From my highly inexperienced look, it seemed to fully support IMAP.

Will this work well for situations where you want ALL mail to remain on
the server, and NOT use a local mailstore?  My impression has always
been that fetchmail was never really designed for this.

Of course, you are right that it doesn't mean we couldn't steal code
from it.

Jesse D. Sightler

"Do not use a hatchet to remove a fly from your friend's forehead." 
      - Chinese Proverb

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]