Re: libfetchmail (was Re: Camel)

["David Fallon" <dfallon ucla edu>]

The more that I look at this, the more that sendmail and fetchmail seem to
be exactly what we need for balsa... They do all the protocols, and are very
well debugged... I'm recommending we use these as the "standard" solution
for mail libraries...

> Is there any reason for not making a libfetchmail?  It seems to me that
most
> of the functionality for a transport library is already in the fetchmail
> program.  All that remains is to seperate what would be useful for a
library
> from the fetchmail interface and the add any functionality that it
currently
> lacks.  Is there some problem with this?
>
> Just a suggestion.
>
> Tony