Re: Fwd: Sketch of new navigation structure

[Thomas Wood <thos gnome org>]

<::... SchAmane ...::> wrote:

> У Сбт, 2005-06-11 у 17:34 +0100, Thomas Wood пише:
>  
>
> > What to people think of this idea? I think with an added "Search" 
> > section (as per tirpse's suggestion) it could work quite well.
> >
> > Do we still need seperate Other and Desktop theme sections? Do we
> >    
> need 
>  
>
> > some more Background categories (nature, abstract...)?
> >    
>
> As i allready wrote in my documents, i think whole categorisation of
> themes should be reworked.
> I dont understand why we split backgrounds and other themes to separate
> parts ? Yes there is difference from programmer view, but for normal
> user this is not interessting. For normal user (who use theme, not make
> them) is more important to sort themes on type, date,
> categories(abstract, os, nature, nude and so on). I think all themes
> should be as one logical part - themes.
>
> Simplifying search was my idea, so i am for this too =)
>
>  
So we should definitely categorise gnome, abstract, nature backgrounds. 
What about themes? Obviously "Other themes" isn't very helpful, but 
"Desktop Themes" means only the themes that the user can install through 
the gnome-theme-manager.

>  
>
> > Art
> >
> >    * Introduction
> >
> > 1. Introduction/what important role (eye candy, functionality, 
> > usability) graphics play in GNOME
> > 2. what's art.gnome as a project
> > 3. How to contribute (explaining text, tips, further links/refers to 
> > tutorials)
> >    
>
> If you will include all this on one link, maybe it should have another
> name than "Introduction"?
>
>  
I was possibly thinking of using "About", but I don't know if that is 
any better...

-Thomas