Re: [anjuta-devel] RFC: Symbol-db future

[Massimo Cora' <maxcvs email it>]

Hi,

On 12/13/2010 10:08 AM, Johannes Schmid wrote:
> Hi Nanci!
>
> > One simple join would limit the actual_headers to the ones in gtk+ or
> > the ones in gdk. When adding a header to a project, we could look for
> > it in actual_headers and just add it to the relation if it's found.
> > Otherwise we add it to actual_headers and make a relation to the
> > current project.
> >
> > If more than a project depends on the same headers, it wouldn't be
> > duplicated (you can easily exclude it in the query).
>
> This would help us for libraries that have a single include but people
> files bugs that they don't like to autocompletion for symbols that
> aren't available in the current source file because they didn't include
> the library in that file which sounds reasonable to me.


can you please point me to some bugs? I'd like to investigate deeper the 
cases that are bothering the users.
On anjuta 2.32 there is no filtering on global packages 
[https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=625657] and as such it would 
be understandable that they wouldn't have completion for glib when they 
are just using plain c.

regards,
Massimo