Re: bonobo* ...



On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 17:06 +0100, michael meeks wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> 	So - it seems no-one bothered to either do a bonobo release or poke me
> about it, and bonobo is essentially maintainerless.

You might call for a new maintainer - for instance, on d-d-l.

> 	However - there are a load of (mostly minor) fixes, new translations, &
> bits in HEAD libbonobo[ui] and also Tor's Win32 work.
> 
> 	Also - I imagine that all developers have been jhbuilding against HEAD
> bonobos for a long time now without significant incident.
> 
> 	Anyhow - I'd like to package this lot up & release, is that going to be
> ok ?

Seems OK with me, given that it doesn't seem to have any new features or
API, and has been tested from cvs. Thanks.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]