Re: bonobo* ...

[Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com>]

On 8/17/05, michael meeks <michael meeks novell com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
>         So - it seems no-one bothered to either do a bonobo release or poke me
> about it, and bonobo is essentially maintainerless.

I didn't poke becuase I figured it was essentially considered 'done'
by you at this point. I did not take into account the translations and
win32 work.

>         Also - I imagine that all developers have been jhbuilding against HEAD
> bonobos for a long time now without significant incident.

Yes. Well, not 'all', but enough that I'm not too worried on a quality count.

>         Anyhow - I'd like to package this lot up & release, is that going to be
> ok ?

I don't see any objections from the QA team perspective, and I assume
that this is a big plus for translation and portability, so... no
objections here, at least. anyone else?

Luis